In the pregame show for Monday Night Football, ESPN did a segment on Adrian Peterson that featured the usual assortment of oddly-tinted shots, industrial chains and proclamations about greatness.
In the lead-in to the segment, Stuart Scott mentioned that Adrian Peterson ran for 296 yards in his eighth NFL game. He followed that up by mentioning how many yards Walter Payton, Jim Brown and Emmitt Smith ran for in their eighth NFL games — Peterson had more (which is natural, since it is the NFL record for more yards ever, in any game, no matter where it fell in a back’s career).
Scott used those numbers to say Peterson could become the greatest running back ever, without any sort of context ,or clarification, or even the faintest cognizance that there could be something wrong with the idea of using a running back’s eighth NFL game as a benchmark of future career success.
This, my friends, is the single worst use of statistics I’ve ever seen.